Comparing Children's Performance on and Preference for a Number-Line Estimation Task: Tablet Versus Paper and Pencil. (June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Piatt, Carley; Coret, Marian; Choi, Michael; Volden, Joanne; Bisanz, Jeffrey
• Is Part Of: Journal of psychoeducational assessment. Volume 34:Number 3(2016)
• Page Start: 244
• Page End: 255
• Publication Date: 2016-06
• Subjects: tablets -- cognitive psychology -- mathematical thinking -- elementary students; Ability -- Testing -- Periodicals; Educational tests and measurements -- Periodicals; 371.713
• DOI: 10.1177/0734282915594746
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0734-2829

Abstract

Tablet computers (tablets) are positioned to be powerful, innovative, effective, and motivating research and assessment tools. We addressed two questions critical for evaluating the appropriateness of using tablets to study number-line estimation, a skill associated with math achievement and argued to be central to numerical cognition. First, is performance with paper and pencil comparable with performance on a tablet? Second, is comparability affected by students' preference for one method of presentation? Thirty-two students in Grade 6 estimated targets on a number line; half estimated with paper and pencil and half with a tablet. For both presentation methods, students' performance was comparable. Students liked both presentation conditions equally but, when asked to choose, most students preferred the tablet. Preference did not influence comparability of results across presentation methods. Finally, students' reasons for their preferences were explored, along with implications for using tablet applications in research and educational assessment.