'Crimea is ours': A discursive history. (June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hopf, Ted
• Is Part Of: International relations. Volume 30:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 227
• Page End: 255
• Publication Date: 2016-06
• Subjects: 9/11 -- Crimea -- discourse analysis -- national identity -- North Atlantic Treaty Organization -- neoliberalism -- Putin -- Russian foreign policy -- Ukraine -- USSR; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 303.482
• DOI: 10.1177/0047117816645646
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0047-1178

Abstract

Russia could have annexed Crimea anytime in the last 25 years. The fact that it did so only in March 2014 is a puzzle. I argue that the predominant discourse of Russian national identity by 2014 made the annexation of Crimea and military intervention in eastern Ukraine both thinkable and natural to Moscow. A history of the discursive terrain of Russia from 1992 to 2014 shows how Russia's national identity has evolved over the years, both in response to Western inactions or actions and domestic developments. But Russian identity is not a sufficient explanation for Russian behavior in Ukraine. For that, we must pay attention to the event itself: Western support for the Maidan protestors, Western failure to adhere to the February 2014 agreements reached with Moscow on a transitional government in Ukraine with Yanukovych at its head and new elections in November, the presence of disgruntled Russians in Ukraine, and perhaps most important, over a decade of US unilateralism in foreign affairs.