Interventions to improve medication adherence in coronary disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Santo, Karla; Kirkendall, Suzanne; Laba, Tracey-Lea; Thakkar, Jay; Webster, Ruth; Chalmers, John; Chow, Clara K; Redfern, Julie
• Is Part Of: European journal of preventive cardiology. Volume 23:Number 10(2016)
• Page Start: 1065
• Page End: 1076
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: Medication adherence -- medication compliance -- coronary disease -- multiple medications -- polypharmacy -- systematic review -- meta-analysis -- randomised controlled trial; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cardiac patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1177/2047487316638501
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-4873

Abstract

Background: Adherence to multiple cardiovascular (CV) medications is a cornerstone of coronary heart disease (CHD) management and prevention, but it is sub-optimal worldwide. This review aimed to examine whether interventions improve adherence to multiple CV medications in a CHD population. Design: This study was based on a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Methods: Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching multiple databases and reference lists. Studies were selected if they evaluated interventions aiming to improve adherence to multiple CV medications targeting a CHD population and if they provided an appropriate measure of adherence. Interventions were classified as complex or simple interventions. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and pooled for a meta-analysis. Risk of bias, heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Sixteen studies (10, 706 patients) were included. The mean age was 62 years (standard deviation (SD) 3.6) and 72% were male. In a pooled analysis, the interventions significantly improved medication adherence (OR 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–1.86; p < 0.001) and there were no significant differences based on intervention type (complex vs simple), components categories and adherence method. There was moderate heterogeneity ( I 2 = 61%) across the studies. After adjusting for publication bias, the effect size was attenuated but remained significant (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09–1.68). Conclusion: Interventions to improve adherence to multiple CV medication in a CHD population significantly improved the odds of being adherent. Simple one-component interventions might be a promising way to improve medication adherence in a CHD population, as they would be easier to replicate in different settings and on a large scale.