"We can stop work, but then nothing gets done." Factors that support and hinder a workforce to discontinue work for safety. (October 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- "We can stop work, but then nothing gets done." Factors that support and hinder a workforce to discontinue work for safety. (October 2018)
- Main Title:
- "We can stop work, but then nothing gets done." Factors that support and hinder a workforce to discontinue work for safety
- Authors:
- Weber, David E.
MacGregor, Sean C.
Provan, David J.
Rae, Andrew - Abstract:
- Highlights: Stopping work for safety is challenging at times. Stopping does not solely hinge on the willingness of individual workers to stop. Stopping is dependent on contextual factors that influence the stop work decision. Contextual factors involve procedural, social, technical, and non-technical aspects. An Authority to Stop has to be embedded in and supported by a stop work environment. Abstract: Workers have a legal obligation not to perform unsafe work. In many organisations this obligation is supported by an explicit authority to discontinue work or to stop the work of others if the conditions of work are unsafe. The supporting document is often called an 'Authority to Stop an Unsafe Task.' However, when conducting work at the sharp operational end of the organisation, stopping work for safety might be challenging at times. A better understanding is required about the stopping of work and the application of an 'Authority to Stop.' The aim of this research is to identify some of the factors that support and hinder a workforce to effectively stop work when a task is deemed unsafe. 10 focus groups were conducted with workers of various roles in the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) industry. The findings outline reasons to stop, challenges and supporting factors of stopping, as well as ways of stopping. The results indicate that the stopping of an unsafe task does not solely hinge on the willingness of individual workers to stop, but also depends on contextual factorsHighlights: Stopping work for safety is challenging at times. Stopping does not solely hinge on the willingness of individual workers to stop. Stopping is dependent on contextual factors that influence the stop work decision. Contextual factors involve procedural, social, technical, and non-technical aspects. An Authority to Stop has to be embedded in and supported by a stop work environment. Abstract: Workers have a legal obligation not to perform unsafe work. In many organisations this obligation is supported by an explicit authority to discontinue work or to stop the work of others if the conditions of work are unsafe. The supporting document is often called an 'Authority to Stop an Unsafe Task.' However, when conducting work at the sharp operational end of the organisation, stopping work for safety might be challenging at times. A better understanding is required about the stopping of work and the application of an 'Authority to Stop.' The aim of this research is to identify some of the factors that support and hinder a workforce to effectively stop work when a task is deemed unsafe. 10 focus groups were conducted with workers of various roles in the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) industry. The findings outline reasons to stop, challenges and supporting factors of stopping, as well as ways of stopping. The results indicate that the stopping of an unsafe task does not solely hinge on the willingness of individual workers to stop, but also depends on contextual factors surrounding the stop work decision. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Safety science. Volume 108(2018)
- Journal:
- Safety science
- Issue:
- Volume 108(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 108, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 108
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0108-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 149
- Page End:
- 160
- Publication Date:
- 2018-10
- Subjects:
- Stop work -- Authority to stop -- Safety -- Resilience engineering -- Oil and gas
Industrial accidents -- Periodicals
Accident Prevention -- Periodicals
Safety -- Periodicals
Travail -- Accidents -- Périodiques
363.11 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09257535 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/safety-science/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.032 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0925-7535
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8069.124900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6642.xml