Assessment of cognitive functions in bipolar I disorder: A 1‐year naturalistic follow‐up study. (4th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sagar, Rajesh; Sahu, Anamika; Pattanayak, Raman Deep; Chatterjee, Biswadip
• Is Part Of: Bipolar disorders. Volume 20:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: 248
• Page End: 259
• Publication Date: 2018-01-04
• Subjects: bipolar I disorder -- cognitive functions -- India -- longitudinal study; Manic-depressive illness -- Periodicals; Depression, Mental -- Periodicals; 616.895
• DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12584
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1398-5647

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Available findings from cross‐sectional studies have demonstrated cognitive impairments in bipolar I disorder (BD‐I) during various phases of illness. However, very little is known about the longitudinal course of these cognitive impairments. The purpose of the study was to explore the longitudinal pattern of changes in cognitive functioning of BD‐I patients. Methods: A total of 129 BD‐I subjects (manic, depressed and euthymic groups) and 49 healthy controls were recruited using predefined selection criteria. All four study groups were assessed on various clinical and cognitive parameters (for attention, memory, executive functions and working memory) at study intake and at 3‐monthly intervals over the next year. Results: All three patient groups performed poorly compared to controls on all cognitive measures at study intake and on some cognitive measures at the 3‐, 6‐, 9‐ and 12‐month assessments. No significant time effects were observed for any cognitive test. A significant group by time interaction effect was found for executive functions (β = −44.74; P = .018) and working memory (β = 0.77; P ≤ .019) in the depressed group at 12 months; for visual memory (β = 1.21; P = .039) and working memory (β = 1.17; P ≤ .029) in the manic group at 12 months; and for working memory (β = −0.52; P ≤ .036) in the euthymic group at 12 months. Conclusion: The patient groups showed significant impairments in all or some test domains relative to controls at all time‐points. The cognitive functions largely remained stable in all patient groups, with slight improvement over time in a few tests. Further investigation is warranted in larger samples in longitudinal studies.