A Comprehensive Nutrition‐Focused Quality Improvement Program Reduces 30‐Day Readmissions and Length of Stay in Hospitalized Patients. (6th December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Comprehensive Nutrition‐Focused Quality Improvement Program Reduces 30‐Day Readmissions and Length of Stay in Hospitalized Patients. (6th December 2016)
- Main Title:
- A Comprehensive Nutrition‐Focused Quality Improvement Program Reduces 30‐Day Readmissions and Length of Stay in Hospitalized Patients
- Authors:
- Sriram, Krishnan
Sulo, Suela
VanDerBosch, Gretchen
Partridge, Jamie
Feldstein, Josh
Hegazi, Refaat A.
Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Although screening patients for malnutrition risk on hospital admission is standard of care, nutrition shortfalls are undertreated. Nutrition interventions can improve outcomes. We tested effects of a nutrition‐focused quality improvement program (QIP) on hospital readmission and length of stay (LOS). Materials and Methods: QIP included malnutrition risk screening at admission, prompt initiation of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) for at‐risk patients, and nutrition support. A 2‐group, pre‐post design of malnourished adults with any diagnosis was conducted at 4 hospitals: QIP‐basic (QIPb) and QIP‐enhanced (QIPe). Comparator patients had a malnutrition diagnosis and ONS orders. For QIPb, nurses screened all patients on admission using an electronic medical record (EMR)–cued Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST); ONS was provided to patients with MST scores ≥2 within 24–48 hours. QIPe had ONS within 24 hours, postdischarge nutrition instructions, telephone calls, and ONS coupons. Primary outcome was 30‐day unplanned readmission. We used baseline (January 1–December 31, 2013) and validation cohorts (October 13, 2013–April 2, 2014) for comparison. Results: Patients (n = 1269) were enrolled in QIPb (n = 769) and QIPe (n = 500). Analysis included baseline (n = 4611) and validation (n = 1319) comparator patients. Compared with a 20% baseline readmission rate, post‐QIP relative reductions were 19.5% for all QIP, 18% for QIPb, and 22% for QIPe, respectively.Abstract : Background: Although screening patients for malnutrition risk on hospital admission is standard of care, nutrition shortfalls are undertreated. Nutrition interventions can improve outcomes. We tested effects of a nutrition‐focused quality improvement program (QIP) on hospital readmission and length of stay (LOS). Materials and Methods: QIP included malnutrition risk screening at admission, prompt initiation of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) for at‐risk patients, and nutrition support. A 2‐group, pre‐post design of malnourished adults with any diagnosis was conducted at 4 hospitals: QIP‐basic (QIPb) and QIP‐enhanced (QIPe). Comparator patients had a malnutrition diagnosis and ONS orders. For QIPb, nurses screened all patients on admission using an electronic medical record (EMR)–cued Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST); ONS was provided to patients with MST scores ≥2 within 24–48 hours. QIPe had ONS within 24 hours, postdischarge nutrition instructions, telephone calls, and ONS coupons. Primary outcome was 30‐day unplanned readmission. We used baseline (January 1–December 31, 2013) and validation cohorts (October 13, 2013–April 2, 2014) for comparison. Results: Patients (n = 1269) were enrolled in QIPb (n = 769) and QIPe (n = 500). Analysis included baseline (n = 4611) and validation (n = 1319) comparator patients. Compared with a 20% baseline readmission rate, post‐QIP relative reductions were 19.5% for all QIP, 18% for QIPb, and 22% for QIPe, respectively. Compared with a 22.1% validation readmission rate, relative reductions were 27.1%, 25.8%, and 29.4%, respectively. Similar reductions were noted for LOS. Conclusions: Thirty‐day readmissions and LOS were significantly lowered for malnourished inpatients by use of an EMR‐cued MST, prompt provision of ONS, patient/caregiver education, and sustained nutrition support. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- JPEN, Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. Volume 41:Number 3(2017)
- Journal:
- JPEN, Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Number 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0041-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 384
- Page End:
- 391
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12-06
- Subjects:
- outcomes research/quality -- nutrition support practice -- nutrition -- nutrition assessment -- nutrition‐focused interventions -- nutrition education
Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral feeding -- Periodicals
615.85484 - Journal URLs:
- http://pen.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0148607116681468 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0148-6071
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5029.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6619.xml