A functional comparison of conventional knee–ankle–foot orthoses and a microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis system based on biomechanical parameters. (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schmalz, Thomas; Pröbsting, Eva; Auberger, Roland; Siewert, Gordon
• Is Part Of: Prosthetics and orthotics international. Volume 40:Number 2(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 277
• Page End: 286
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: Biomechanics of prosthetic/orthotic devices -- testing of prosthetic and orthotic components -- rehabilitation of orthoses users -- lower limb orthotics; Orthopedic apparatus -- Periodicals; Prosthesis -- Periodicals; Implants, Artificial -- Periodicals; 617.905
• DOI: 10.1177/0309364614546524
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-3646

Abstract

Background: The microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis C-Brace enables patients with paretic or paralysed lower limb muscles to use dampened knee flexion under weight-bearing and speed-adapted control of the swing phase. Objectives: The objective of the present study was to investigate the new technical functions of the C-Brace orthosis, based on biomechanical parameters. Study design: The study enrolled six patients. The C-Brace orthosis is compared with conventional leg orthoses (four stance control orthoses, two locked knee–ankle–foot orthoses) using biomechanical parameters of level walking, descending ramps and descending stairs. Methods: Ground reaction forces, joint moments and kinematic parameters were measured for level walking as well as ascending and descending ramps and stairs. Results: With the C-Brace, a nearly natural stance phase knee flexion was measured during level walking (mean value 11° ± 5.6°). The maximum swing phase knee flexion angle of the C-Brace approached the normal value of 65° more closely than the stance control orthoses (66° ± 8.5° vs 74° ± 6.4°). No significant differences in the joint moments were found between the C-Brace and stance control orthosis conditions. In contrast to the conventional orthoses, all patients were able to ambulate ramps and stairs using a step-over-step technique with C-Brace (flexion angle 64.6° ± 8.2° and 70.5° ± 12.4°). Conclusion: The results show that the functions of the C-Brace for situation-dependent knee flexion under weight bearing have been used by patients with a high level of confidence. Clinical relevance: The functional benefits of the C-Brace in comparison with the conventional orthotic mechanisms could be demonstrated most clearly for descending ramps and stairs. The C-Brace orthosis is able to combine improved orthotic function with sustained orthotic safety.