Exploring the usefulness of structural–functional approaches to analyse governance of planning systems. (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Potts, Ruth; Vella, Karen; Dale, Allan; Sipe, Neil
• Is Part Of: Planning theory. Volume 15:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 162
• Page End: 189
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: analysis -- complex systems -- governance -- planning -- structural-functionalism; Planning -- Periodicals; City planning -- Periodicals; Planification -- Périodiques; Urbanisme -- Périodiques; 307.12
• DOI: 10.1177/1473095214553519
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-0952

Abstract

Existing planning theories tend to be limited in their analytical scope and often fail to account for the impact of many interactions between the multitudes of stakeholders involved in strategic planning processes. Although many theorists rejected structural–functional approaches from the 1970s, this article argues that many of structural–functional concepts remain relevant and useful to planning practitioners. In fact, structural–functional approaches are highly useful and practical when used as a foundation for systemic analysis of real-world, multi-layered, complex planning systems to support evidence-based governance reform. Such approaches provide a logical and systematic approach to the analysis of the wider governance of strategic planning systems that is grounded in systems theory and complementary to existing theories of complexity and planning. While we do not propose its use as a grand theory of planning, this article discusses how structural–functional concepts and approaches might be applied to underpin a practical analysis of the complex decision-making arrangements that drive planning practice, and to provide the evidence needed to target reform of poorly performing arrangements.