Prevalence of environmental annoyance in a Swedish and Finnish general population: Impact of everyday exposures on affect and behavior. (April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nordin, Steven; Karvala, Kirsi; Nyback, Maj-Helen; Sainio, Markku
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental psychology. Volume 56(2018)
• Page Start: 84
• Page End: 90
• Publication Date: 2018-04
• Subjects: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity -- Idiopathic environmental intolerance -- Multiple chemical sensitivity -- Noise sensitivity -- Population-based -- Prevalence; Environmental psychology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; 155.905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.03.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-4944

Abstract

Abstract: We identified optimal cutoff scores for three questionnaire instruments that quantify environmental annoyance (affective reactions and behavioral disruptions) attributed to everyday environmental exposures of chemicals, electromagnetic fields and sounds, and applied these cutoff scores to estimate the prevalence of such reactions in two general populations. Data were used from 4941 participants from Swedish and Finnish population-based surveys. The identified optimal cutoff scores showed excellent diagnostic accuracy, and provided prevalence rates for these reactions of 28.8 and 27.0% for chemicals, 7.0 and 7.7% for electromagnetic fields, and 27.8 and 28.3% for sounds, for the Swedish and Finnish samples, respectively. The prevalence rates varied between age groups and sexes. The findings suggest that the cutoffs are useful for identifying individuals or groups with affective and behavioral reactions to everyday environmental exposures, and that the prevalence rate for these reactions vary depending on type of exposure, age and sex. Highlights: Cutoff scores are available for different types of environmental annoyance. Environmental annoyance is prevalent in 7–29% of the population depending on source. Annoyance to chemicals and sounds are far more common than to electrical devices. Annoyance to all three sources is more common in women than in men. There is comorbidity in annoyance between sources.