Logical Inconsistencies in 3 Preference Elicitation Methods for EQ-5D Health States: A Study in the Brazilian Population. (February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Logical Inconsistencies in 3 Preference Elicitation Methods for EQ-5D Health States: A Study in the Brazilian Population. (February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Logical Inconsistencies in 3 Preference Elicitation Methods for EQ-5D Health States
- Authors:
- Viegas Andrade, Mônica
Noronha, Kenya
Kind, Paul
de Barros Reis, Carla
Resende de Carvalho, Lucas - Abstract:
- Background . Logical inconsistency for health states preferences occurs when one logically worse health state, in terms of quality of life, is ranked higher than a logically better health state.Objective . This study explores the presence of inconsistent responses for the EQ-5D health states valuations in a Brazilian population survey. It compares the level of inconsistency in 3 preference-based methods: ranking, visual analog scale (VAS), and time tradeoff (TTO). The influence of EQ-5D health state descriptions is explored by examining the distance between states using a city-block metric as an indicator of proximity. Moreover, it examines the association between formal education and the presence of inconsistencies, as well as the effect of removing inconsistent respondents on the estimation of social value sets from TTO and VAS.Methods . Data came from a valuation study with 3362 literate individuals aged between 18 and 64 years living in urban areas of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Logical inconsistency was assessed using the percentage of inconsistent respondents and inconsistency rate. A logistic model was estimated to assess the association between formal education and the logical inconsistency. Societal preferences were estimated excluding inconsistent respondents considering city-block metric.Results . The percentage of inconsistent respondents and inconsistency rate are similar for TTO and ranking and lower for VAS. The probability of being inconsistent is higherBackground . Logical inconsistency for health states preferences occurs when one logically worse health state, in terms of quality of life, is ranked higher than a logically better health state.Objective . This study explores the presence of inconsistent responses for the EQ-5D health states valuations in a Brazilian population survey. It compares the level of inconsistency in 3 preference-based methods: ranking, visual analog scale (VAS), and time tradeoff (TTO). The influence of EQ-5D health state descriptions is explored by examining the distance between states using a city-block metric as an indicator of proximity. Moreover, it examines the association between formal education and the presence of inconsistencies, as well as the effect of removing inconsistent respondents on the estimation of social value sets from TTO and VAS.Methods . Data came from a valuation study with 3362 literate individuals aged between 18 and 64 years living in urban areas of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Logical inconsistency was assessed using the percentage of inconsistent respondents and inconsistency rate. A logistic model was estimated to assess the association between formal education and the logical inconsistency. Societal preferences were estimated excluding inconsistent respondents considering city-block metric.Results . The percentage of inconsistent respondents and inconsistency rate are similar for TTO and ranking and lower for VAS. The probability of being inconsistent is higher among less educated groups in ranking and TTO. Inconsistency decreases with distance for all 3 methods. The removal of inconsistent individuals by considering city-block distance improves TTO estimation of social value sets.Conclusion . Findings suggest that removal of inconsistencies in TTO should consider city-block distance. For VAS, inconsistencies are not associated with formal education and do not affect social value set estimation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical decision making. Volume 36:Number 2(2016)
- Journal:
- Medical decision making
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Number 2(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0036-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 242
- Page End:
- 252
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02
- Subjects:
- EQ-5D -- utility inconsistencies -- health preference elicitation -- health-related quality of life -- cost utility analysis
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Clinical medicine -- Decision making -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine clinique -- Prise de décision -- Périodiques
362.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mdm ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/sage/j501 ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0272-989x;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0272989X15601047 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0272-989X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6565.xml