A comparison of strain and classic experimental modal analysis. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kranjc, Tadej; Slavič, Janko; Boltežar, Miha
• Is Part Of: Journal of vibration and control. Volume 22:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 371
• Page End: 381
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Experimental modal analysis -- strain response -- the piezoelectric strain sensor -- strain mode shapes; Vibration -- Periodicals; Damping (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; 620.3
• DOI: 10.1177/1077546314533137
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1077-5463

Abstract

This research is focused on a comparison of classic and strain experimental modal analysis (EMA). The modal parameters (the natural frequencies, the displacement mode shapes (DMSs) and the damping) of real structures are usually identified with classic EMA, where the responses are measured with motion sensors (e.g. accelerometers). Strain EMA is a special approach in the field of EMA, where the responses are measured with strain sensors. Classic EMA is the preferred method, but strain EMA offers advantages that are important for particular applications: for example, the direct identification of strain mode shapes (SMSs), which is important in the vibration-fatigue and damage-identification models. The next advantage is that strain EMA can sometimes be used, for experimental/geometrical reasons, where classic EMA cannot. There are also drawbacks: for example with strain EMA only, the mass-normalization of the DMSs and SMSs cannot be performed. This study researches the theoretical similarities and differences of both EMA approaches. Furthermore, the accuracy of both approaches for the case of a free–free supported beam and a free–free supported plate is investigated. Classic and strain EMA were performed with a piezoelectric accelerometer and the piezoelectric strain gauges, respectively. The results show that the accuracy of strain EMA results (the natural frequencies, DMSs and the damping) is comparable to the accuracy of classic EMA.