Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia. (July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia. (July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia
- Authors:
- Kwon, Min-Seok
Oh, Sang-Yeob
Cho, Sung-Am - Abstract:
- Abstract: Problem statement: Full zirconia crowns have recently been used for dental restorations because of their mechanical properties. However, there is little information about their wear characteristics against enamel, gold, and full zirconia crowns. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the wear rate of enamel, gold crowns, and zirconia crowns against zirconia blocks using an in vitro wear test. Materials and methods: Upper specimens were divided into three groups: 10 enamels (group 1), 10 gold crowns (group 2, Type III gold), and 10 zirconia crowns (group 3, Prettau ® Zirkon 9H, Zirkonzahn, Italy). Each of these specimens was wear tested against a zirconia block (40×30×3 mm 3 ) as a lower specimen (30 total zirconia blocks). Each specimen of the groups was abraded against the zirconia block for 600 cycles at 1 Hz with 15 mm front-to-back movement on an abrading machine. Moreover, the load applied during the abrading test was 50 N, and the test was performed in a normal saline emulsion for 10 min. Three-dimensional images were taken before and after the test, and the statistical analysis was performed using the Krushal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test ( p =0.05). Results: The mean volume loss of group 1 was 0.47 mm 3, while that of group 2 and group 3 was 0.01 mm 3 . Conclusion: The wear volume loss of enamels against zirconia was higher than that of gold and zirconia crowns. Moreover, according to this result, zirconia crowns are not recommended for heavyAbstract: Problem statement: Full zirconia crowns have recently been used for dental restorations because of their mechanical properties. However, there is little information about their wear characteristics against enamel, gold, and full zirconia crowns. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the wear rate of enamel, gold crowns, and zirconia crowns against zirconia blocks using an in vitro wear test. Materials and methods: Upper specimens were divided into three groups: 10 enamels (group 1), 10 gold crowns (group 2, Type III gold), and 10 zirconia crowns (group 3, Prettau ® Zirkon 9H, Zirkonzahn, Italy). Each of these specimens was wear tested against a zirconia block (40×30×3 mm 3 ) as a lower specimen (30 total zirconia blocks). Each specimen of the groups was abraded against the zirconia block for 600 cycles at 1 Hz with 15 mm front-to-back movement on an abrading machine. Moreover, the load applied during the abrading test was 50 N, and the test was performed in a normal saline emulsion for 10 min. Three-dimensional images were taken before and after the test, and the statistical analysis was performed using the Krushal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test ( p =0.05). Results: The mean volume loss of group 1 was 0.47 mm 3, while that of group 2 and group 3 was 0.01 mm 3 . Conclusion: The wear volume loss of enamels against zirconia was higher than that of gold and zirconia crowns. Moreover, according to this result, zirconia crowns are not recommended for heavy bruxers. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. Volume 47(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
- Issue:
- Volume 47(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0047-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 21
- Page End:
- 28
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07
- Subjects:
- Zirconia -- Wear -- Enamel -- Fixed partial dentures
Biomedical materials -- Periodicals
Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals
Biomedical materials
Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17516161 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.029 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1751-6161
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5015.809000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6573.xml