Endoscopic Versus "No-Touch" Saphenous Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Trade-Off Between Wound Healing and Graft Patency. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kopjar, Tomislav; Dashwood, Michael R.
• Is Part Of: Angiology. Volume 67:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 121
• Page End: 132
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: coronary artery bypass grafting -- no-touch vein harvesting -- endoscopic vein harvesting -- saphenous vein patency -- vascular damage; Blood-vessels -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.13005
• DOI: 10.1177/0003319715584126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-3197

Abstract

The advantage in terms of wound infection, wound healing, and scarring has resulted in the recent adoption of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) as a standard of care for coronary artery bypass grafting in some centers. However, concerns regarding the quality of these grafts have been raised after recent evidence of decreased graft patency, increased reoperation rate, and myocardial infarct, problems that are associated with vascular trauma caused when using this technique. Simultaneously, an atraumatic, "no-touch" technique for harvesting the saphenous vein was developed producing grafts with improved patency comparable to the internal thoracic artery. However, wound complications remain a problem using this technique. This review outlines the need to consider the poor graft quality that may result from EVH and raises the question what is likely to be the "best practice principle" in saphenous vein harvesting?