Evaluating Robotic Surgical Skills Performance Under Distractive Environment Using Objective and Subjective Measures. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Suh, Irene H.; LaGrange, Chad A.; Oleynikov, Dmitry; Siu, Ka-Chun
• Is Part Of: Surgical innovation. Volume 23:Number 1(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 78
• Page End: 89
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: da Vinci Surgical System -- kinematics -- electromyography -- noise -- NASA Task Load Index; Surgery, Operative -- Periodicals; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals; Diffusion of Innovation -- Periodicals; Chirurgie opératoire -- Périodiques; Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques; Chirurgie laparoscopique -- Périodiques; 617.91
• DOI: 10.1177/1553350615596637
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1553-3506

Abstract

Background . Distractions are recognized as a significant factor affecting performance in safety critical domains. Although operating rooms are generally full of distractions, the effect of distractions on robot-assisted surgical (RAS) performance is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the effect of distractions on RAS performance using both objective and subjective measures. Methods . Fifteen participants performed a knot-tying task using the da Vinci Surgical System and were exposed to 3 distractions: (1) passive distraction entailed listening to noise with a constant heart rate, (2) active distraction included listening to noise and acknowledging a change of random heart rate from 60 to 120 bpm, and (3) interactive distraction consisted of answering math questions. The objective kinematics of the surgical instrument tips were used to evaluate performance. Electromyography (EMG) of the forearm and hand muscles of the participants were collected. The median EMG frequency (EMGfmed ) and the EMG envelope (EMGenv ) were analyzed. NASA Task Load Index and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery score were used to evaluate the subjective performance. One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to examine the effects of distraction on skills performance. Spearman's correlations were conducted to compare objective and subjective measures. Results . Significant distraction effect was found for all objective kinematics measures ( P < .05). There were significant distraction effects for EMG measures (EMGenv, P < .004; EMGfmed, P = .031). Significant distraction effects were also found for subjective measurements. Conclusions . Distraction impairs surgical skills performance and increases muscle work. Understanding how the surgeons cope with distractions is important in developing surgical education.