Choice under incomplete information on incumbents: Why consumers with stronger preferences are more likely to abandon their prior choices. Issue 2 (16th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Irmak, Caglar; Kramer, Thomas; Sen, Sankar
• Is Part Of: Journal of consumer psychology. Volume 27:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 264
• Page End: 269
• Publication Date: 2016-06-16
• Subjects: Preference strength -- Cognitive dissonance -- Preliminary choices -- Motivated reasoning; Consumer behavior -- Periodicals; Consumption (Economics) -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; 658.8342
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1057-7408

Abstract

Abstract: Consumers often encounter information about new brands that is not available for their preliminary or prior choices. For example, continued browsing might expose consumers to information that is unknown for an option they already placed in their shopping cart. How might preference strength affect their reactions to such missing information on their prior choices? Much research suggests that consumers with strong prior preferences are likely to employ motivated reasoning to bolster and retain the preliminary choice. However, we document a heretofore unexamined condition under which those with relatively stronger prior preferences for an incumbent are more likely to abandon it than those with weaker prior preferences. We argue that this occurs because those with relatively stronger (vs. weaker) prior preferences experience more cognitive dissonance when information on new attributes is missing on just the incumbent but not on its competitors.