Using the applied element method for modelling calcium silicate brick masonry subjected to in‐plane cyclic loading. (26th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Malomo, Daniele; Pinho, Rui; Penna, Andrea
• Is Part Of: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Volume 47:Number 7(2018)
• Page Start: 1610
• Page End: 1630
• Publication Date: 2018-03-26
• Subjects: applied element method -- calcium silicate -- discrete elements -- numerical modelling -- unreinforced masonry; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1762
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0098-8847

Abstract

Summary: The response of calcium silicate unreinforced masonry construction to horizontal cyclic loading has recently become the focus of experimental and numerical research, given its extensive use in some areas of the world that are now exposed to induced earthquakes (eg, north of the Netherlands). To assess the seismic behaviour of such construction, a relatively wide range of modelling methodologies are available, amongst which the discrete elements approach, which takes into account the intrinsic heterogeneity of a brick‐mortar assembly, can probably be deemed as the most appropriate computational procedure. On the other hand, however, since discrete elements numerical methods are based on a discontinuum domain, often they are not able to model every stage of the structural response adequately, and because of the high computational burden required, the analysis scale should be chosen carefully. The applied element method is a relatively recent addition to the discrete elements family, with a high potential for overcoming the aforementioned limitations or difficulties. Initially conceived to model blast events and concrete structures, its use in the earthquake engineering field is, of late, increasing noticeably. In this paper, the use of the applied element method to model the in‐plane cyclic response of calcium silicate masonry walls is discussed and scrutinised, also through the comparison with experimental results of in‐plane cyclic shear‐compression tests on unreinforced masonry walls.