ASPEN‐FELANPE Clinical Guidelines: Nutrition Support of Adult Patients With Enterocutaneous Fistula. (2nd December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kumpf, Vanessa J.; de Aguilar‐Nascimento, Jose Eduardo; Diaz‐Pizarro Graf, Jose Ignacio; Hall, Amber M.; McKeever, Liam; Steiger, Ezra; Winkler, Marion F.; Compher, Charlene W.
• Is Part Of: JPEN, Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. Volume 41:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 104
• Page End: 112
• Publication Date: 2016-12-02
• Subjects: GI fistula -- enterocutaneous fistula -- nutrition support; Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals; Enteral feeding -- Periodicals; 615.85484
• DOI: 10.1177/0148607116680792
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-6071

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The management of patients with enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) requires an interdisciplinary approach and poses a significant challenge to physicians, wound/stoma care specialists, dietitians, pharmacists, and other nutrition clinicians. Guidelines for optimizing nutrition status in these patients are often vague, based on limited and dated clinical studies, and typically rely on individual institutional or clinician experience. Specific nutrient requirements, appropriate route of feeding, role of immune‐enhancing formulas, and use of somatostatin analogues in the management of patients with ECF are not well defined. The purpose of this clinical guideline is to develop recommendations for the nutrition care of adult patients with ECF. Methods: A systematic review of the best available evidence to answer a series of questions regarding clinical management of adults with ECF was undertaken and evaluated using concepts adopted from the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. An anonymous consensus process was used to develop the clinical guideline recommendations prior to peer review and approval by the ASPEN Board of Directors and by FELANPE. Questions: In adult patients with enterocutaneous fistula: (1) What factors best describe nutrition status? (2) What is the preferred route of nutrition therapy (oral diet, enteral nutrition, or parenteral nutrition)? (3) What protein and energy intake provide best clinical outcomes? (4) Is fistuloclysis associated with better outcomes than standard care? (5) Are immune‐enhancing formulas associated with better outcomes than standard formulas? (6) Does the use of somatostatin or somatostatin analogue provide better outcomes than standard medical therapy? (7) When is home parenteral nutrition support indicated?