An Objective Measure of Splitting in Parental Alienation: The Parental Acceptance–Rejection Questionnaire1. Issue 3 (17th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bernet, William; Gregory, Nilgun; Reay, Kathleen M.; Rohner, Ronald P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of forensic sciences. Volume 63:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 776
• Page End: 783
• Publication Date: 2017-08-17
• Subjects: forensic science -- child psychiatry -- children of divorce -- splitting -- parental alienation -- parental acceptance–rejection questionnaire; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Forensic sciences -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Gerechtelijke geneeskunde; Gerechtelijke chemie; Gerechtelijke psychiatrie; 363.2505
• DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13625
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1198

Abstract

Abstract: Both clinicians and forensic practitioners should distinguish parental alienation (rejection of a parent without legitimate justification) from other reasons for contact refusal. Alienated children—who were not abused—often engage in splitting and lack ambivalence with respect to the rejected parent; children who were maltreated usually perceive the abusive parent in an ambivalent manner. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of the Parental Acceptance–Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ) in identifying and quantifying the degree of splitting, which may assist in diagnosing parental alienation. Results showed that severely alienated children engaged in a high level of splitting, by perceiving the preferred parent in extremely positive terms and the rejected parent in extremely negative terms. Splitting was not manifested by the children in other family groups. The PARQ may be useful for both clinicians and forensic practitioners in evaluating children of divorced parents when there is a concern about the possible diagnosis of parental alienation.