Automated verbal credibility assessment of intentions: The model statement technique and predictive modeling. Issue 3 (2nd April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kleinberg, Bennett; van der Toolen, Yaloe; Vrij, Aldert; Arntz, Arnoud; Verschuere, Bruno
• Is Part Of: Applied cognitive psychology. Volume 32:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 354
• Page End: 366
• Publication Date: 2018-04-02
• Subjects: credibility assessment -- intentions -- machine learning -- model statement -- verbal deception detection; Cognition -- Periodicals; Psychology, Applied -- Periodicals; 153
• DOI: 10.1002/acp.3407
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0888-4080

Abstract

Summary: Recently, verbal credibility assessment has been extended to the detection of deceptive intentions, the use of a model statement, and predictive modeling. The current investigation combines these 3 elements to detect deceptive intentions on a large scale. Participants read a model statement and wrote a truthful or deceptive statement about their planned weekend activities (Experiment 1). With the use of linguistic features for machine learning, more than 80% of the participants were classified correctly. Exploratory analyses suggested that liars included more person and location references than truth‐tellers. Experiment 2 examined whether these findings replicated on independent‐sample data. The classification accuracies remained well above chance level but dropped to 63%. Experiment 2 corroborated the finding that liars' statements are richer in location and person references than truth‐tellers' statements. Together, these findings suggest that liars may over‐prepare their statements. Predictive modeling shows promise as an automated veracity assessment approach but needs validation on independent data.