Safety climate and increased risk: The role of deadlines in design work. (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Daniels, Kevin; Beesley, Nick; Cheyne, Alistair; Wimalasiri, Varuni
• Is Part Of: Human relations. Volume 69:Number 5(2016:May)
• Page Start: 1185
• Page End: 1207
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: design work -- job demands -- oil and gas industry -- safety climate; Social sciences -- Periodicals; 302
• DOI: 10.1177/0018726715612900
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0018-7267

Abstract

Although much research indicates positive safety climate is associated with reduced safety risk, we argue this association is not universal and may even be reversed in some contexts. Specifically, we argue that positive safety climate can be associated with increased safety risk when there is pressure to prioritize production over safety and where workers have some detachment from the consequences of their actions, such as found in engineering design work. We used two indicators of safety risk: use of heuristics at the individual level and design complexity at the design team level. Using experience sampling data ( N = 165, 42 design teams, k = 5752 observations), we found design engineers' perceptions of team positive safety climate were associated with less use of heuristics when engineers were not working to deadlines, but more use of heuristics when engineers were working to deadlines. Independent ratings were obtained of 31 teams' designs of offshore oil and gas platforms ( N = 121). For teams that worked infrequently to deadlines, positive team safety climate was associated with less design complexity. For teams that worked frequently to deadlines, positive team safety climate was associated with more design complexity.