PrEP implementation in the Asia‐Pacific region: opportunities, implementation and barriers. (18th October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zablotska, Iryna; Grulich, Andrew E; Phanuphak, Nittaya; Anand, Tarandeep; Janyam, Surang; Poonkasetwattana, Midnight; Baggaley, Rachel; van Griensven, Frits; Lo, Ying‐Ru
• Is Part Of: Journal of the International AIDS Society. Volume 19(2016)Supplement 6
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2016-10-18
• Subjects: pre‐exposure prophylaxis -- the Asia‐Pacific region -- implementation -- demonstration studies -- PrEP policy -- PrEP awareness -- PrEP use -- MSM; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Periodicals; 616.9792005
• DOI: 10.7448/IAS.19.7.21119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-2652

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: HIV epidemics in the Asia‐Pacific region are concentrated among men who have sex with men (MSM) and other key populations. Pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention intervention and could be a potential game changer in the region. We discuss the progress towards PrEP implementation in the Asia‐Pacific region, including opportunities and barriers. Discussion: Awareness about PrEP in the Asia‐Pacific is still low and so are its levels of use. A high proportion of MSM who are aware of PrEP are willing to use it. Key PrEP implementation barriers include poor knowledge about PrEP, limited access to PrEP, weak or non‐existent HIV prevention programmes for MSM and other key populations, high cost of PrEP, stigma and discrimination against key populations and restrictive laws in some countries. Only several clinical trials, demonstration projects and a few larger‐scale implementation studies have been implemented so far in Thailand and Australia. However, novel approaches to PrEP implementation have emerged: researcher‐, facility‐ and community‐led models of care, with PrEP services for fee and for free. The WHO consolidated guidelines on HIV testing, treatment and prevention call for an expanded access to PrEP worldwide and have provided guidance on PrEP implementation in the region. Some countries like Australia have released national PrEP guidelines. There are growing community leadership and consultation processes to initiate PrEP implementation in Asia and the Pacific. Conclusions: Countries of the Asia‐Pacific region will benefit from adding PrEP to their HIV prevention packages, but for many this is a critical step that requires resourcing. Having an impact on the HIV epidemic requires investment. The next years should see the region transitioning from limited PrEP implementation projects to growing access to PrEP and expansion of HIV prevention programmes.