Kinematic and neuromuscular relationships between lower extremity clinical movement assessments*. Issue 2 (3rd April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mauntel, Timothy C.; Cram, Tyler R.; Frank, Barnett S.; Begalle, Rebecca L.; Norcross, Marc F.; Blackburn, J. Troy; Padua, Darin A.
• Is Part Of: Sports biomechanics. Volume 17:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 273
• Page End: 284
• Publication Date: 2018-04-03
• Subjects: Biomechanics -- electromyography -- jump landing -- squat; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Sports -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Human mechanics -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2017.1348536
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-3141

Abstract

Abstract: Lower extremity injuries have immediate and long-term consequences. Lower extremity movement assessments can assist with identifying individuals at greater injury risk and guide injury prevention interventions. Movement assessments identify similar movement characteristics and evidence suggests large magnitude kinematic relationships exist between movement patterns observed across assessments; however, the magnitude of the relationships for electromyographic (EMG) measures across movement assessments remains largely unknown. This study examined relationships between lower extremity kinematic and EMG measures during jump landings and single leg squats. Lower extremity three-dimensional kinematic and EMG data were sampled from healthy adults (males = 20, females = 20) during the movement assessments. Pearson correlations examined the relationships of the kinematic and EMG measures and paired samples t -tests compared mean kinematic and EMG measures between the assessments. Overall, significant moderate correlations were observed for lower extremity kinematic ( r avg = 0.41, r range = 0.10–0.61) and EMG ( r avg = 0.47, r range = 0.32–0.80) measures across assessments. Kinematic and EMG measures were greater during the jump landings. Jump landings and single leg squats place different demands on the body and necessitate different kinematic and EMG patterns, such that these measures are not highly correlated between assessments. Clinicians should, therefore, use multiple assessments to identify aberrant movement and neuromuscular control patterns so that comprehensive interventions can be implemented.