Life-cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and shale gas fired power generation in China. (15th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chang, Yuan; Huang, Runze; Ries, Robert J.; Masanet, Eric
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 86(2015)
• Page Start: 335
• Page End: 343
• Publication Date: 2015-06-15
• Subjects: Coal -- Shale gas -- Electric power generation -- Life cycle assessment; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: China has the world's largest shale gas reserves, which might enable it to pursue a new pathway for electricity generation. This study employed hybrid LCI (life cycle inventory) models to quantify the ETW (extraction-to-wire) GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and water consumption per kWh of coal- and shale gas-fired electricity in China. Results suggest that a coal-to-shale gas shift and upgrading coal-fired power generation technologies could provide pathways to less GHG and water intensive power in China. Compared to different coal-fired generation technologies, the ETW GHG emissions intensity of gas-fired CC (combined cycle) technology is 530 g CO2 e/kWh, which is 38–45% less than China's present coal-fired electricity. Gas-fired CT (combustion turbine) technology has the lowest ETW water consumption intensity at 960 g/kWh, which is 34–60% lower than China's present coal-fired electricity. The GHG-water tradeoff of the two gas-fired power generation technologies suggests that gas-fired power generation technologies should be selected based on regional-specific water resource availabilities and electricity demand fluctuations in China. However, the low price of coal-fired electricity, high cost of shale gas production, insufficient pipeline infrastructures, and multiple consumers of shale gas resources may serve as barriers to a coal-to-shale gas shift in China's power sector in the near term. Highlights: The GHG and water footprints of coal- and shale gas-fired electricity are estimated. A coal-to-shale gas shift can enable less GHG and water intensive power in China. The GHG emissions of shale gas-fired combined cycle technology is 530 g CO2 e/kWh. The water consumption of shale gas-fired combustion turbine technology is 960 g/kWh. Shale gas-fired power generation technologies selection should be regional-specific.