Understanding stakeholder perspectives on agricultural best management practices and environmental change in the Chesapeake Bay: A Q methodology study. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schall, Daniel; Lansing, David; Leisnham, Paul; Shirmohammadi, Adel; Montas, Hubert; Hutson, Tom
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 60(2018)
• Page Start: 21
• Page End: 31
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Best management practices -- Environmental politics -- Q methodology -- Conservation stakeholders; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: This paper examines differences in environmental attitudes and awareness among stakeholders involved in implementing and promoting agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in the Chesapeake Bay. BMP adoption studies have often considered variables such as environmental attitudes and BMP awareness in examining why farmers do or do not adopt BMPs. Such studies, however, rarely consider the range of viewpoints on these issues across diverse stakeholders such as environmental professionals, scientists, regulators, and agriculturalists. Thus, there is little understanding of how and why knowledge about the environment and BMPs might be deeply contested and a source of political friction between multiple types of actors. In this paper, we take up this issue by examining the relationship between one's subjective understanding of environmental changes and one's attitude towards agricultural best management practices. Doing so, the paper examines the ways in which these two domains align within actors, and maps the variance of these views across a diverse set of stakeholders associated with BMPs. We find a close alignment between one's view of environmental change and the value of BMPs as well as deep divisions between farmers and other non-farming stakeholders with regard to these views. Highlights: Polarized views on the role of best management practices and causes of environmental change between farmers and nonfarmers. Discourses around best management practices closely tied to narratives about environmental change. Reductive scientific view of environmental change tied to positive view of best management practices. Suspicion of scientific narratives of environmental change tied to skepticism of the need for regulations.