Uses of the Self: Two Ways of Thinking about Scholarly Situatedness and Method. (June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Neumann, Cecilie Basberg; Neumann, Iver B.
• Is Part Of: Millennium. Volume 43:Number 3(2015:May)
• Page Start: 798
• Page End: 819
• Publication Date: 2015-06
• Subjects: situatedness -- method -- reflexivism -- analyticist; International relations -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 327.05
• DOI: 10.1177/0305829815576818
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-8298

Abstract

If the scholarly self is irretrievably tied to the world, then self-situating is a fruitful source of data production. The researcher becomes a producer, as opposed to a collector, of data. This how-to paper identifies three analytical stages where such self-situating takes place. Pre-field; there is autobiographical situating; in-field, there is field situating, and post-field, there is textual situating. Each of these stages are presented in terms of the three literatures that have done the most work on them – feminism, Gestalt, and poststructuralism. A number of how-to examples are used to illustrate. In conclusion, we discuss how two different methodological commitments to situatedness, which Jackson (2010) dubbed reflexivist and analyticist, give rise to two analytically distinct ways of using the scholarly self for data production. Reflexivists and analyticists approach data production from opposite ends of the researcher/informant relationship. Where a reflexivist researcher tends to handle the relation between interlocutor and researcher by asking how interlocutors affect the researcher, an analyticist researcher tends to ask how the researcher affects them.