Surgical and oncological long term outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) resection- retrospective cohort study. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Badic, Bogdan; Gancel, Charles Henry; Thereaux, Jérémie; Joumond, Aurélien; Bail, Jean Pierre; Meunier, Bernard; Sulpice, Laurent
• Is Part Of: International journal of surgery. Volume 53(2018)
• Page Start: 257
• Page End: 261
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors -- Open surgery -- Laparoscopy -- Oncologic results -- Long term outcomes; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.074
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-9191

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Surgery remains the mainstay of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treatment. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative outcomes and long term oncologic results of GISTs resection. An analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for GISTs and a subgroup analysis of lesions larger than 5 cm were realized. Materials and methods: Between January 2005 and December 2014, 143 patients with primary GISTs were treated with radical resection in two tertiary centers. Eight patients with metastatic disease were excluded. The remaining patients were assigned to 2 groups: laparoscopy and open surgery. A separate analysis of tumors larger than 5 cm was realized for the laparoscopy group. Long-term follow-up was used to analyze the oncologic and surgical results. Relevant clinical variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: With similar oncological outcomes(p = 0.09) and morbidity(p = 0.56), laparoscopy compared to open surgery significantly reduced length of hospitalization (p = 0.01). For lesions >5 cm laparoscopic resection is associated with similar short-term outcomes with resection for small tumors without compromising oncological outcomes (p = 0.89). For all patients, the probability of remaining disease free at 3 years, and 5 years was 97, 6% and 95%, respectively. Conclusion: Laparoscopic resection is a technically and oncologically safe and feasible approach for GISTs compared with open resection. Resection of lesions superior of 5 cm by laparoscopy has efficacy and recurrence rates similar to open surgical controls. Large tumor resection should only be attempted by surgeons with a large experience with minimally invasive surgery in order to avoid operative complications and unfavorable long term outcome. Highlights: Laparoscopy compared to open surgery significantly reduced length of hospitalization. For lesions >5 cm laparoscopy is associated with similar short-term outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes. The probability of remaining disease free at 3 years and 5 years was 97.6% and 95% respectively.