Evaluating environmental impacts of pig slurry treatment technologies with a life-cycle perspective. (1st July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yuan, Zengwei; Pan, Xiao; Chen, Tianming; Liu, Xuewei; Zhang, You; Jiang, Songyan; Sheng, Hu; Zhang, Ling
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 188(2018)
• Page Start: 840
• Page End: 850
• Publication Date: 2018-07-01
• Subjects: Life cycle assessment -- Pig slurry treatment -- Anaerobic digestion -- Wastewater treatment -- Environmental management; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: Pig husbandry has been developing rapidly during the past few decades, which has greatly increased the amounts of pig slurry as well as environmental impacts. How to appropriately treat the pig slurry has turned to a great challenge for sustainable pig husbandry, and this issue is especially critical to China, the biggest producer and consumer of pigs. This study tried to explore the effective ways of treating pig slurry, which could mitigate environmental impacts and increase resource utilization. The main method used in this study was life cycle assessment, which could evaluate the environmental impacts of four ways of treating pig slurry. Each kind of treatment technology consisted of three main processes - in-house handling, outdoor treatment and end disposal. This study used the CML2001 method to evaluate environmental impacts. Data sources for this study came from field investigations at pig farms, suppliers of relevant technologies, literature and the ecoinvent database. The results indicated that global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and acidification potential (AP) were the three main impact categories. Meanwhile, all scenarios showed negative environmental impacts in ozone layer depletion potential (ODP), freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential (FAETP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP, element & fossil) and human toxicity potential (HTP) impact categories. It was also found that Deep-pit system and field application (DP-FA) scenario performed best in ADP (element & fossil). In-house separation and field application (S-FA) scenario had the lowest GWP and the second lowest EP, while having negative impacts in ODP, FAETP, HTP and ADP (element & fossil). Therefore, this study suggests using DP-FA scenario from the perspective of sustaining long-term resources and popularizing the S-FA scenario in the term of mitigating environmental impacts. Highlights: Global warming potential, eutrophication potential, acidification potential are the main impacts. All scenarios showed negative impacts in the other five environmental impact categories. If resource use takes priority, the deep-pit system and field application scenario is the preferred technology. If mitigating environmental impacts gets priority, the in-house separation and field application scenario is recommended.