Social Capital and Emergency Management Planning: A Test of Community Context Effects on Formal and Informal Collaboration. (July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Bonnie J.; Goerdel, Holly T.; Lovrich, Nicholas P.; Pierce, John C.
• Is Part Of: American review of public administration. Volume 45:Number 4(2015:Jul.)
• Page Start: 476
• Page End: 493
• Publication Date: 2015-07
• Subjects: social capital -- collaboration -- emergency management planning; Public administration -- Periodicals; Public administration -- United States -- Periodicals; 351
• DOI: 10.1177/0275074013504127
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0275-0740

Abstract

Using a sample of U.S. counties, this article explores the relationships between community level resilience, represented by capacity (social capital), information (uses of technology), and motivation (perception of threats to county, ) on the one hand, and county levels of emergency management (EM) collaboration on the other. We hypothesize that the greater relative presence of bridging social capital networks will be associated with greater levels of collaboration in county EM planning, while the greater relative presence of bonding social capital networks will be associated with lower levels of collaboration. Results indicate that first there are two collaborative environments to assess—the formal and informal—and, second, the presence of political networks (seen as predominantly bridging) relative to the presence of religious networks (viewed as predominantly bonding) has a significant and positive effect on informal collaboration levels, but not on formal collaboration levels. These findings provide insight into how community context in the form of network social capital matters for collaborative EM planning efforts. These results add to prior research that focuses primarily on organizational and institutional sources of collaboration and much less on the community level contextual factors at play.