Visual assessment of CPR quality during pediatric cardiac arrest: Does point of view matter?. (May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, Angela; Lin, Yiqun; Nettel-Aguirre, Alberto; Gilfoyle, Elaine; Cheng, Adam
• Is Part Of: Resuscitation. Volume 90(2015)
• Page Start: 50
• Page End: 55
• Publication Date: 2015-05
• Subjects: ACLS Advanced Cardiac Life Support -- AHA American Heart Association -- BLS Basic Life Support -- CPA cardiopulmonary arrest -- CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- CC chest compressions -- ED emergency department -- PALS Paediatric Advanced Life Support -- PICU paediatric intensive care unit; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- Quality -- Resuscitation -- Chest compressions -- Feedback; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Réanimation -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-9572

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: In many clinical settings, providers rely on visual assessment when delivering feedback on CPR quality. Little is known about the accuracy of visual assessment of CPR quality. We aimed to determine how accurate pediatric providers are in their visual assessment of CPR quality and to identify the optimal position relative to the patient for accurate CPR assessment. Methods: We videotaped high-quality CPR (based on 2010 American Heart Association guidelines) and 3 variations of poor quality CPR in a simulated resuscitation, filmed from the foot, head and the side of the manikin. Participants watched 12 videos and completed a questionnaire to assess CPR quality. Results: One hundred and twenty-five participants were recruited. The overall accuracy of visual assessment of CPR quality was 65.6%. Accuracy was better from the side (70.8%) and foot (68.8%) of the bed when compared to the head of the bed (57.2%; p < 0.001). The side was the best position for assessing depth ( p < 0.001). Rate assessment was equivalent between positions ( p = 0.58). The side and foot of the bed were superior to the head when assessing chest recoil ( p < 0.001). Factors associated with increased accuracy in visual assessment of CPR quality included recent CPR course completion ( p = 0.034) and involvement in more cardiac arrests as a team member ( p = 0.003). Conclusion: Healthcare providers struggle to accurately assess the quality of CPR using visual assessment. If visual assessment is being used, providers should stand at the side of the bed.