A Chinese medicine warm compress (Wen Jing Zhi Tong Fang), combined with WHO 3-step analgesic ladder treatment for cancer pain relief: A comparative randomized trial. Issue 11 (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cai, Peiling; Li, Liuning; Hong, Hongxi; Zhang, Liwen; He, Chunxia; Chai, Xiaoshu; Liu, Bai; Chen, Zhijian
• Other Names: Sun. YX section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 97:Issue 11(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: back meridians -- cancer-related pain -- Chinese medicine -- warm compress; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009965
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Chinese medicine warm compress (CMWC) on back meridians in relieving cancer pain, reducing adjuvant analgesic doses and adverse reactions, and improving the quality of life (QOL). Methods: A total of 62 patients (age range 39–82 years) diagnosed with a malignant tumor and suffering from cancer-related pain were randomly divided into a treatment group (group A) and a control group (group B) (n = 31 for each). The patients in both groups were administered appropriate drugs for 2 cycles of 7-day treatments according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 3-step ladder for cancer pain relief in adults. In addition, a CMWC was given to patients in group A. Pain relief was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at various time points before and after interventions in each group. Alteration of analgesic doses, adverse reactions, performance status (PS), and QOL were evaluated and any differences between groups A and B evaluated. Results: VAS scores at various time points after treatment were significantly decreased compared with the baseline level in group A. Overall response rate was significantly improved in group A compared with group B (70.97% vs 29.03%, P < .001). Significant differences in clinical pain relief efficacy in various locations were found in group A after treatment vs before treatment ( P < .05). Adjuvant analgesic doses were significantly changed in the control group compared to the treatment group after 1 cycle of 7-day treatment (22.58% vs 12.90%, P = .023). QOL were improved more in group A than in group B (3.00 ± 4.23 vs −2.06 ± 2.38, P < .001). Significantly reduced adverse reactions were observed after treatment of group A compared with group B in terms of the overall incidence (3.23% vs 80.65%, P < .05) or incidence of constipation (3.23% vs 77.42%, P < .05). Conclusions: The application of CMWC on back meridians combined with WHO 3-step analgesic ladder treatment was effective in relieving cancer-related pain with reduced doses, less adverse reactions, and improved QOL.