Feasibility of sustained low efficiency dialysis in critically sick pediatric patients: A multicentric retrospective study. Issue 2 (3rd October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sethi, Sidharth K.; Sinha, Rajiv; Jha, Pranaw; Wadhwani, Nikita; Raghunathan, Veena; Dhaliwal, Maninder; Bansal, Shyam B.; Kher, Vijay; Lobo, Valentine; Sharma, Jyoti; Raina, Rupesh
• Is Part Of: Hemodialysis international. Volume 22:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 228
• Page End: 234
• Publication Date: 2017-10-03
• Subjects: Sustained low‐efficiency dialysis (SLED) -- dialysis -- pediatrics -- critical‐care -- sustained low efficiency dialysis; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Renal Dialysis -- Periodicals; Renal Dialysis -- Congresses; Hemodialysis, Home -- Congresses; 617.461059
• DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12605
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1492-7535

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Sustained low‐efficiency dialysis (SLED) has emerged as a cost effective alternative to Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in the management of hemodynamically unstable adult patients with acute kidney injury. The objective of the study was to document the SLED practices in these centers, and to look at the feasibility, and tolerability of SLED in critically sick pediatric patients. Methods: It was a retrospective record review from January 2010 to June 2016 done in four tertiary pediatric nephrology centers in India. All pediatric patients undergoing SLED in the collaborating centers were included in the study. Basic demographic data, prescription parameters and outcomes of patients were recorded. Findings: During the study period a total of 68 children received 211 sessions of SLED. PRISM score at admission in patients was 13.33 ± 9.15. Fifty‐seven patients were ventilated (84%). Most of the patients had one or more organ system involved in addition to renal (n = 64; 94%). Heparin free sessions were achievable in 153 sessions (72%). Out of 211 sessions, 148 sessions were on at least one inotrope (70.1%). Overall premature terminations had to be done in 27 sessions (13% of all sessions), out of which 7 sessions had to be terminated due to circuit clotting (3.3%). Intradialytic hypotension or need for inotrope escalation was seen in 31 (15%) sessions but termination of the session for drop in BP was required in only 20 (9%) sessions. Conclusion: SLED is a feasible method of providing renal replacement in critically ill pediatric patients.