Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone. Issue 1 (27th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jung, Ronald E.; Ioannidis, Alexis; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.; Thoma, Daniel S.
• Is Part Of: Periodontology 2000. Volume 77:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 165
• Page End: 175
• Publication Date: 2018-02-27
• Subjects: Periodontics -- Periodicals; 617.632
• DOI: 10.1111/prd.12209
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-6713

Abstract

Abstract: In the esthetic zone, in the case of tooth extraction, the clinician is often confronted with a challenge regarding the optimal decision‐making process for providing a solution using dental implants. This is because, after tooth extraction, alveolar bone loss and structural and compositional changes of the covering soft tissues, as well as morphological alterations, can be expected. Ideally, the therapeutic plan starts before tooth extraction and it offers three options: spontaneous healing of the extraction socket; immediate implant placement; and techniques for preserving the alveolar ridge at the site of tooth removal. The decision‐making process mainly depends on: (i) the chosen time‐point for implant placement and the ability to place a dental implant; (ii) the quality and quantity of soft tissue in the region of the extraction socket; (iii) the remaining height of the buccal bone plate; and (iv) the expected rates of implant survival and success. Based on scientific evidence, three time‐periods for alveolar ridge preservation are described in the literature: (i) soft‐tissue preservation with 6–8 weeks of healing after tooth extraction (for optimization of the soft tissues); (ii) hard‐ and soft‐tissue preservation with 4–6 months of healing after tooth extraction (for optimization of the hard and soft tissues); and (iii) hard‐tissue preservation with > 6 months of healing after tooth extraction (for optimization of the hard tissues).