How do sea-ice concentrations from operational data compare with passive microwave estimates? Implications for improved model evaluations and forecasting. Issue 69 (2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Meier, Walter N.; Fetterer, Florence; Stewart, J. Scott; Helfrich, Sean
• Is Part Of: Annals of glaciology. Volume 56:Issue 69(2015)
• Page Start: 332
• Page End: 340
• Publication Date: 2015
• Subjects: remote sensing, -- sea ice, -- sea-ice modelling; Glaciology -- Periodicals; 551.3105 qA613
• DOI: 10.3189/2015AoG69A694
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0260-3055

Abstract

Abstract: Passive microwave sensors have produced a 35 year record of sea-ice concentration variability and change. Operational analyses combine a variety of remote-sensing inputs and other sources via manual integration to create high-resolution, accurate charts of ice conditions in support of navigation and operational forecast models. One such product is the daily Multisensor Analyzed Sea Ice Extent (MASIE). The higher spatial resolution along with multiple input data and manual analysis potentially provide more precise mapping of the ice edge than passive microwave estimates. However, since MASIE is based on an operational product, estimates may be inconsistent over time due to variations in input data quality and availability. Comparisons indicate that MASIE shows higher Arctic-wide extent values throughout most of the year, largely because of the limitations of passive microwave sensors in some conditions (e.g. surface melt). However, during some parts of the year, MASIE tends to indicate less ice than estimated by passive microwave sensors. These comparisons yield a better understanding of operational and research sea-ice data products; this in turn has important implications for their use in climate and weather models.