Zotarolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stent versus a biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT VI): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Issue 9977 (18th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Raungaard, Bent; Jensen, Lisette Okkels; Tilsted, Hans-Henrik; Christiansen, Evald Høj; Maeng, Michael; Terkelsen, Christian Juhl; Krusell, Lars Romer; Kaltoft, Anne; Kristensen, Steen Dalby; Bøtker, Hans Erik; Thuesen, Leif; Aarøe, Jens; Jensen, Svend Eggert; Villadsen, Anton Boel; Thayssen, Per; Veien, Karsten Tange; Hansen, Knud Nørregaard; Junker, Anders; Madsen, Morten; Ravkilde, Jan; Lassen, Jens Flensted
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 385:Issue 9977(2015)
• Page Start: 1527
• Page End: 1535
• Publication Date: 2015-04-18
• Subjects: Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine; Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61794-3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-6736

Abstract

Summary: Background: New-generation drug-eluting coronary stents have reduced the risk of coronary events, especially in patients with complex disease or lesions. To what extent different stent platforms, polymers, and antiproliferative drugs affect outcomes, however, is unclear. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a third-generation stent by comparing a highly biocompatible durable-polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent. Methods: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial was done at three sites across western Denmark. All patients who presented with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and at least one coronary artery lesion (more than 50% stenosis) from March, 2011, to August, 2012, were assessed for eligibility. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent or the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was a composite of safety (cardiac death and myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion) and efficacy (target-lesion revascularisation) at 12 months, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was powered to assess non-inferiority of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent with a predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0·025. This trial is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT01956448 . Findings: Of 7103 screened, 1502 patients with 1883 lesions were assigned to receive the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1497 patients with 1791 lesions to receive the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent. 79 (5·3%) and 75 (5·0%) patients, respectively, met the primary endpoint (absolute risk difference 0·0025, upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 0·016%; p=0·004). The individual components of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between stent types at 12 months. Interpretation: The durable-polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent was non-inferior to the biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients. Funding: Medtronic Cardiovascular and Biosensors Interventional Technologies.