Examining the effects of source selection method on procurement outcomes. Issue 1 (3rd July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Landale, Karen A.F.; Rendon, Rene G.; Hawkins, Timothy G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of defense analytics and logistics. Volume 1:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 47
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2017-07-03
• Subjects: Procurement -- Supplier performance -- Source selection -- Supplier evaluation; Military art and science -- Periodicals; Military research -- Periodicals; Defense industries -- Periodicals; Logistics -- Periodicals; 355.4
• DOI: 10.1108/JDAL-05-2017-0006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-6439

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this research is to explore the effects of supplier selection method on key procurement outcomes such as procurement lead time (PLT), supplier performance and buyer team size. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from a sample of 124 archival contract records from the US Department of Defense. A multiple regression model and multivariate analysis of covariance/analysis of covariance models were used to test the effects of source selection method on pertinent procurement outcomes. Findings: The trade-off (TO) source selection method increases PLT, as does the number of evaluation factors and the number of proposals received. Substantially larger sourcing teams are also associated with the TO source selection method. Nonetheless, the TO method results in better supplier performance. Practical implications: TO source selections yield superior supplier performance than low-bidder methods. However, they are costly in terms of time and personnel. Any assessment of supplier value should consider not only the price premium for higher performance but also the transaction costs associated with the TO method. Originality/value: Very little research addresses a buying team's evaluation of supplier-offered value ex ante and whether that value assessment materializes into actual value-added supplier performance. Low bidder tactics are pervasive, but price (i.e. sacrifice) is only one component of value. Benefits from superior supplier performance may yield greater overall value. If value is critical to the buyer, a TO source selection method – versus a low-bidder approach – is the appropriate tool because of higher supplier performance ex post.