Approaches to modeling the development of physiological stress responsivity. (31st October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hinnant, J. Benjamin; Philbrook, Lauren E.; Erath, Stephen A.; El‐Sheikh, Mona
• Is Part Of: Psychophysiology. Volume 55:Number 5(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-10-31
• Subjects: adolescence -- autonomic nervous system -- childhood -- developmental sensitivity -- longitudinal analysis -- stress responsivity; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13027
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0048-5772

Abstract

Abstract: Influential biopsychosocial theories have proposed that some developmental periods in the lifespan are potential pivot points or opportunities for recalibration of stress response systems. To date, however, there have been few longitudinal studies of physiological stress responsivity and no studies comparing change in physiological stress responsivity across developmental periods. Our goals were to (a) address conceptual and methodological issues in studying the development of physiological stress responsivity within and between individuals, and (b) provide an exemplar for evaluating development of responsivity to stress in the parasympathetic nervous system, comparing respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) responsivity from middle to late childhood with middle to late adolescence. We propose the use of latent growth modeling of stress responsivity that includes time‐varying covariates to account for conceptual and methodological issues in the measurement of physiological stress responsivity. Such models allow researchers to address key aspects of developmental sensitivity including within‐individual variability, mean level change over time, and between‐individual variability over time. In an empirical example, we found significant between‐individual variability over time in RSA responsivity to stress during middle to late childhood but not during middle to late adolescence, suggesting that childhood may be a period of greater developmental sensitivity at the between‐individual level.