Publication trend, resource utilization, and impact of the US National Cancer Database: A systematic review. Issue 9 (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Su, Chang; Peng, Cuiying; Agbodza, Ena; Bai, Harrison X.; Huang, Yuqian; Karakousis, Giorgos; Zhang, Paul J.; Zhang, Zishu
• Other Names: Palazón-Bru. Antonio section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 97:Issue 9(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: bibliometrics -- National Cancer Database -- publication trend -- resource utilization; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009823
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The utilization and impact of the studies published using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) is currently unclear. In this study, we aim to characterize the published studies, and identify relatively unexplored areas for future investigations. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed in January 2017 to identify all papers published using NCDB data. Characteristics of the publications were extracted. Citation frequencies were obtained through the Web of Science. Results: Three hundred 2 articles written by 230 first authors met the inclusion criteria. The number of publications grew exponentially since 2013, with 108 articles published in 2016. Articles were published in 86 journals. The majority of the published papers focused on digestive system cancer, while bone and joints, eye and orbit, myeloma, mesothelioma, and Kaposi Sarcoma were never studied. Thirteen institutions in the United States were associated with more than 5 publications. The papers have been cited for a total of 9858 times since the publication of the first paper in 1992. Frequently appearing keywords congregated into 3 clusters: "demographics, " "treatments and survival, " and "statistical analysis method." Even though the main focuses of the articles captured a extremely wide range, they can be classified into 2 main categories: survival analysis and characterization. Other focuses include database(s) analysis and/or comparison, and hospital reporting. Conclusion: The surging interest in the use of NCDB is accompanied by unequal utilization of resources by individuals and institutions. Certain areas were relatively understudied and should be further explored.