Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood. (April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cho, Eunseong; Kim, Seonghoon
• Is Part Of: Organizational research methods. Volume 18:Number 2(2015:Apr.)
• Page Start: 207
• Page End: 230
• Publication Date: 2015-04
• Subjects: reliability -- coefficient alpha -- tau-equivalency -- internal consistency -- multidimensionality -- multiple-factor model; Organization -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Organizational sociology -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Management -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 302.350721
• DOI: 10.1177/1094428114555994
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1094-4281

Abstract

This study disproves the following six common misconceptions about coefficient alpha: (a) Alpha was first developed by Cronbach. (b) Alpha equals reliability. (c) A high value of alpha is an indication of internal consistency. (d) Reliability will always be improved by deleting items using "alpha if item deleted." (e) Alpha should be greater than or equal to .7 (or, alternatively, .8). (f) Alpha is the best choice among all published reliability coefficients. This study discusses the inaccuracy of each of these misconceptions and provides a correct statement. This study recommends that the assumptions of unidimensionality and tau-equivalency be examined before the application of alpha and that structural equation modeling (SEM)–based reliability estimators be substituted for alpha when one of these conditions is not satisfied. This study also provides formulas for SEM-based reliability estimators that do not rely on matrix notation and step-by-step explanations for the computation of SEM-based reliability estimates.