A Comparison of Methods for Converting DCE Values onto the Full Health-Dead QALY Scale. (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Comparison of Methods for Converting DCE Values onto the Full Health-Dead QALY Scale. (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- A Comparison of Methods for Converting DCE Values onto the Full Health-Dead QALY Scale
- Authors:
- Rowen, Donna
Brazier, John
Van Hout, Ben - Abstract:
- Background. Preference elicitation techniques such as time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) receive criticism for their complexity and difficulties of use. Ordinal techniques such as discrete choice experiment (DCE) are arguably easier to understand but generate values that are not anchored onto the full health-dead 1-0 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) scale required for use in economic evaluation. Methods. This article compares existing methods for converting modeled DCE latent values onto the full health-dead QALY scale: 1) anchoring DCE values using dead as valued in the DCE and 2) anchoring DCE values using TTO value for worst state to 2 new methods: 3) mapping DCE values onto TTO and 4) combining DCE and TTO data in a hybrid model. Models are compared using their ability to predict mean TTO health state values. Data. We use postal DCE data ( n = 263) and TTO data ( n = 307) collected by interview in a general population valuation study of an asthma condition-specific measure (AQL-5D). Results. New methods 3 and 4 using mapping and hybrid models are better able to predict mean TTO health state values (mean absolute difference [MAD], 0.052–0.084) than the anchor-based methods (MAD, 0.075–0.093) and were better able to predict mean TTO health state values even when using in their estimation a subsample of the available TTO data. Conclusions. These new mapping and hybrid methods have a potentially useful role for producing values on the QALY scale from dataBackground. Preference elicitation techniques such as time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) receive criticism for their complexity and difficulties of use. Ordinal techniques such as discrete choice experiment (DCE) are arguably easier to understand but generate values that are not anchored onto the full health-dead 1-0 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) scale required for use in economic evaluation. Methods. This article compares existing methods for converting modeled DCE latent values onto the full health-dead QALY scale: 1) anchoring DCE values using dead as valued in the DCE and 2) anchoring DCE values using TTO value for worst state to 2 new methods: 3) mapping DCE values onto TTO and 4) combining DCE and TTO data in a hybrid model. Models are compared using their ability to predict mean TTO health state values. Data. We use postal DCE data ( n = 263) and TTO data ( n = 307) collected by interview in a general population valuation study of an asthma condition-specific measure (AQL-5D). Results. New methods 3 and 4 using mapping and hybrid models are better able to predict mean TTO health state values (mean absolute difference [MAD], 0.052–0.084) than the anchor-based methods (MAD, 0.075–0.093) and were better able to predict mean TTO health state values even when using in their estimation a subsample of the available TTO data. Conclusions. These new mapping and hybrid methods have a potentially useful role for producing values on the QALY scale from data elicited using ordinal techniques such as DCE for use in economic evaluation that makes best use of the desirable properties of each elicitation technique and elicited data. Further research is encouraged. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical decision making. Volume 35:Number 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Medical decision making
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0035-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 328
- Page End:
- 340
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- preference-based measures of health -- health-related quality of life -- discrete choice experiment -- pairwise comparisons
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Clinical medicine -- Decision making -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine clinique -- Prise de décision -- Périodiques
362.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mdm ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/sage/j501 ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0272-989x;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0272989X14559542 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0272-989X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6295.xml