Comparison Between Sandwich Bone Augmentation and Allogenic Block Graft for Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible. Issue 1 (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison Between Sandwich Bone Augmentation and Allogenic Block Graft for Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible. Issue 1 (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison Between Sandwich Bone Augmentation and Allogenic Block Graft for Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible
- Authors:
- Leong, Daylene Jack-Min
Oh, Tae-Ju
Benavides, Erika
Al-Hezaimi, Khalid
Misch, Carl E.
Wang, Hom-Lay - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate 2 different techniques for vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) of the posterior mandible. Materials and Methods: Sixteen subjects with 19 posterior mandibular edentulous sites requiring VRA were recruited for the study. Sites were randomly treated with either block allograft (BA; N = 9) or sandwich bone augmentation (SBA; N = 10). Clinical measurements were recorded at the time of surgery (baseline) and 6-month reentry with a custom-made acrylic surgical template. Results: The mean vertical bone gain (VBG) after mean 6.8 months was 44.5% (mean = 1.78 mm [0–5 mm]) in the BA group and 33.3% (mean = 1.0 mm [−1 to 3 mm]) in the SBA group. Significantly higher rates of incision line openings and wound dehiscences were found in the BA group (n = 7/9, 77.8%) as compared with the SBA group (n = 3/10, 30%) ( P = 0.037). After adjusting for graft exposure, BA group demonstrated significantly higher VBG than SBA (difference = 2.26 mm, P < 0.001). In addition, graft exposure resulted in significantly less VBG in both groups ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: A higher tendency of wound exposure during VRA was demonstrated when a BA was used compared with the SBA technique. However, if wound exposure could be prevented, higher vertical ridge gain could be achieved with a BA. Summary: The use of a BA in VRA resulted in a maximum of 2 mm more bone height gain compared with the SBA technique if theAbstract : Introduction: The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate 2 different techniques for vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) of the posterior mandible. Materials and Methods: Sixteen subjects with 19 posterior mandibular edentulous sites requiring VRA were recruited for the study. Sites were randomly treated with either block allograft (BA; N = 9) or sandwich bone augmentation (SBA; N = 10). Clinical measurements were recorded at the time of surgery (baseline) and 6-month reentry with a custom-made acrylic surgical template. Results: The mean vertical bone gain (VBG) after mean 6.8 months was 44.5% (mean = 1.78 mm [0–5 mm]) in the BA group and 33.3% (mean = 1.0 mm [−1 to 3 mm]) in the SBA group. Significantly higher rates of incision line openings and wound dehiscences were found in the BA group (n = 7/9, 77.8%) as compared with the SBA group (n = 3/10, 30%) ( P = 0.037). After adjusting for graft exposure, BA group demonstrated significantly higher VBG than SBA (difference = 2.26 mm, P < 0.001). In addition, graft exposure resulted in significantly less VBG in both groups ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: A higher tendency of wound exposure during VRA was demonstrated when a BA was used compared with the SBA technique. However, if wound exposure could be prevented, higher vertical ridge gain could be achieved with a BA. Summary: The use of a BA in VRA resulted in a maximum of 2 mm more bone height gain compared with the SBA technique if the primary coverage can be achieved during the healing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Implant dentistry. Volume 24:Issue 1(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Implant dentistry
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Issue 1(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0024-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- ridge augmentation -- bone regeneration -- allograft
Dental implants -- Periodicals
617.69305 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/implantdent/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00008505-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ID.0000000000000180 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1056-6163
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4371.436300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6257.xml