Mind the Gap: Formal Ethics Policies and Chemical Scientists' Everyday Practices in Academia and Industry. (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mind the Gap: Formal Ethics Policies and Chemical Scientists' Everyday Practices in Academia and Industry. (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Mind the Gap
- Authors:
- Smith-Doerr, Laurel
Vardi, Itai - Other Names:
- Croissant Jennifer L. guest-editor.
- Abstract:
- Asymmetrical convergence is the increasing overlap between academic and industrial sectors, but with academia moving closer toward for-profit industrial norms than vice versa. Although this concept, developed by Kleinman and Vallas, is useful, processes of asymmetrical convergence in daily laboratory life are largely unexplored. Here, observations of three lab groups of chemical scientists in academic and industry contexts illustrate variation in interactions with ethics-related policies (as defined by the respondents). Findings show more tension for academic science with business-based practices, such as the move toward greater accountability, than for industrial science with academic practices. This asymmetry is evident in the process of purposive decoupling: for example, where academic scientists use humor to distance themselves from the performance of compliance in required reporting and top-down ethics training requirements. This distancing from meaningless requirements (formalism) contrasts with mentoring around practices of professional behavior that are thought to matter (engagement). Convergence is evident in how safety policies seem more engaging than other kinds of policies. Yet, power structures shape engagement. Academic engagement often means rule following, and flows vertically from professor's authority to student apprenticeship. Industry engagement includes collaborative problem solving and flows along a more horizontal peer structure where informal power isAsymmetrical convergence is the increasing overlap between academic and industrial sectors, but with academia moving closer toward for-profit industrial norms than vice versa. Although this concept, developed by Kleinman and Vallas, is useful, processes of asymmetrical convergence in daily laboratory life are largely unexplored. Here, observations of three lab groups of chemical scientists in academic and industry contexts illustrate variation in interactions with ethics-related policies (as defined by the respondents). Findings show more tension for academic science with business-based practices, such as the move toward greater accountability, than for industrial science with academic practices. This asymmetry is evident in the process of purposive decoupling: for example, where academic scientists use humor to distance themselves from the performance of compliance in required reporting and top-down ethics training requirements. This distancing from meaningless requirements (formalism) contrasts with mentoring around practices of professional behavior that are thought to matter (engagement). Convergence is evident in how safety policies seem more engaging than other kinds of policies. Yet, power structures shape engagement. Academic engagement often means rule following, and flows vertically from professor's authority to student apprenticeship. Industry engagement includes collaborative problem solving and flows along a more horizontal peer structure where informal power is less visible. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Science, technology, & human values. Volume 40:Number 2(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Science, technology, & human values
- Issue:
- Volume 40:Number 2(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 40, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0040-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 176
- Page End:
- 198
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- ethics -- politics -- power -- governance -- labor
Science -- Social aspects -- Periodicals
Technology -- Social aspects -- Periodicals
Humanities -- Periodicals
303.48305 - Journal URLs:
- http://STH.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://sth.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/01622439.html ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0162-2439;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0162243914557950 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0162-2439
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6242.xml