Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production. (August 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production. (August 2018)
- Main Title:
- Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production
- Authors:
- Cremiato, Raffaele
Mastellone, Maria Laura
Tagliaferri, Carla
Zaccariello, Lucio
Lettieri, Paola - Abstract:
- Abstract: Material and energy recovery from waste is significantly growing its importance in the last decades aiming to reduce the primary resources exploitation and the excessive recourse to incineration and landfilling. Several processes, technologies and methods can be chosen to design a proper waste management system (WMS) so that an objective comparison between alternatives has to be made. To this end, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can be used to compare possible alternative scenarios and create an evaluation grid where different environmental parameters are reported. The aim of this work was to compare the environmental impacts of four different scenarios already analysed for technological and economic aspects in a previous work. The scenario taken as base case referred to a real waste management system applied in Caserta Province, an area of 924, 614 inhabitants in the Campania region of Southern Italy. The base scenario considers the household separation of waste in five fractions addressed to material recovery (polyethylene, polyethylen-terephtalate, polypropylene, metals, cellulosic fibers, …), composting (biowaste) and incineration (residual waste). The results of the LCA demonstrated that the best scenario is that one including the highest separate collection rate technically and economically feasible to be carried out i.e. 60%, the recourse to anaerobic digestion and biogas production to treat the biowaste separately collected and the maximization of theAbstract: Material and energy recovery from waste is significantly growing its importance in the last decades aiming to reduce the primary resources exploitation and the excessive recourse to incineration and landfilling. Several processes, technologies and methods can be chosen to design a proper waste management system (WMS) so that an objective comparison between alternatives has to be made. To this end, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can be used to compare possible alternative scenarios and create an evaluation grid where different environmental parameters are reported. The aim of this work was to compare the environmental impacts of four different scenarios already analysed for technological and economic aspects in a previous work. The scenario taken as base case referred to a real waste management system applied in Caserta Province, an area of 924, 614 inhabitants in the Campania region of Southern Italy. The base scenario considers the household separation of waste in five fractions addressed to material recovery (polyethylene, polyethylen-terephtalate, polypropylene, metals, cellulosic fibers, …), composting (biowaste) and incineration (residual waste). The results of the LCA demonstrated that the best scenario is that one including the highest separate collection rate technically and economically feasible to be carried out i.e. 60%, the recourse to anaerobic digestion and biogas production to treat the biowaste separately collected and the maximization of the re-processing of recyclable materials such as PET, HDPE, glass, metals, … In particular, the Global Warming Potential decrease of 166% and the Eutrophication Potential decrease of 646%, when the alternative scenario, including the recalled features is compared to the base-case one. The most important result is that the raised separate collection of recyclable materials utilized as substitutes of raw materials and of biowaste utilized for production of renewable energy helps to mitigate the direct and indirect burdens connected to the overall life cycle of goods production. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Renewable energy. Volume 124(2018)
- Journal:
- Renewable energy
- Issue:
- Volume 124(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 124, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0124-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 180
- Page End:
- 188
- Publication Date:
- 2018-08
- Subjects:
- Life cycle assessment -- Waste management -- Material recycling -- Anaerobic digestion -- Scenario comparison
EFA energy flow analysis -- EP Eutrophication Potential -- GWP Global Warming Potential -- LCA Life Cycle Assessment -- LCI Life Cycle Inventory -- LCIA Life Cycle Impact Assessment -- MBT Mechanical-Biological Treatment -- MFA Material Flow Analysis -- MRW Mixed Recyclable Waste -- MRF Material Recovery Facility -- MSW Municipal Solid Waste -- PE PolyEthilene -- PET PolyEthilenTerephatalate -- SFA Substance Flow Analysis -- WMS Waste Management System -- WtE Waste to Energy
Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals
Power resources -- Periodicals
Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques
Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques
333.794 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09601481 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.033 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-1481
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7364.187000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6229.xml