Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Large-scale Speech Tasks. (April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sainath, Tara N.; Kingsbury, Brian; Saon, George; Soltau, Hagen; Mohamed, Abdel-rahman; Dahl, George; Ramabhadran, Bhuvana
• Is Part Of: Neural networks. Volume 64(2015:Apr.)
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 48
• Publication Date: 2015-04
• Subjects: Deep learning -- Neural networks -- Speech recognition; Neural computers -- Periodicals; Neural networks (Computer science) -- Periodicals; Neural networks (Neurobiology) -- Periodicals; Nervous System -- Periodicals; Ordinateurs neuronaux -- Périodiques; Réseaux neuronaux (Informatique) -- Périodiques; Réseaux neuronaux (Neurobiologie) -- Périodiques; Neural computers; Neural networks (Computer science); Neural networks (Neurobiology); Periodicals; 006.32
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.08.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0893-6080

Abstract

Abstract: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are an alternative type of neural network that can be used to reduce spectral variations and model spectral correlations which exist in signals. Since speech signals exhibit both of these properties, we hypothesize that CNNs are a more effective model for speech compared to Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). In this paper, we explore applying CNNs to large vocabulary continuous speech recognition (LVCSR) tasks. First, we determine the appropriate architecture to make CNNs effective compared to DNNs for LVCSR tasks. Specifically, we focus on how many convolutional layers are needed, what is an appropriate number of hidden units, what is the best pooling strategy. Second, investigate how to incorporate speaker-adapted features, which cannot directly be modeled by CNNs as they do not obey locality in frequency, into the CNN framework. Third, given the importance of sequence training for speech tasks, we introduce a strategy to use ReLU+dropout during Hessian-free sequence training of CNNs. Experiments on 3 LVCSR tasks indicate that a CNN with the proposed speaker-adapted and ReLU+dropout ideas allow for a 12%–14% relative improvement in WER over a strong DNN system, achieving state-of-the art results in these 3 tasks.