Effect of tear supplements on signs, symptoms and inflammatory markers in dry eye. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martin, Eilidh; Oliver, Katherine M.; Pearce, E. Ian; Tomlinson, Alan; Simmons, Peter; Hagan, Suzanne
• Is Part Of: Cytokine. Volume 105(2018)
• Page Start: 37
• Page End: 44
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Dry eye disease -- Cytokines -- Biomarkers -- Tears -- Inflammation; Cytokines -- Periodicals; 571.844
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.02.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1043-4666

Abstract

Highlights: All three tear supplements significantly reduce symptoms of dry eye disease. All three tear supplements significantly improve tear film stability. CGC drops showed the greatest apparent reduction in inflammatory markers. Results suggest mismatch between symptoms and inflammatory markers. Abstract: Purpose: Three tear supplements were compared for their effects on the signs, symptoms and inflammatory status of subjects with dry eye disease. Assessments were made before and after both 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Methods: In this masked, randomized, 3-way crossover trial, eighteen dry eye subjects were recruited. At each visit, symptoms, tear evaporation rate, stability and osmolarity were measured and tear samples were analyzed for 7 inflammatory markers, using multiplex immunoassays. The 3 treatments included carboxymethylcellulose-glycerine-castor oil (CGC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and hydroxypropyl guar (HPG). The CGC and HPG drops are emulsified lipids; CGC also contains osmoprotectants. The CMC drop is a standard aqueous polymeric supplement. Results: Significant improvements were seen in symptoms (OSDI) and tear stability (NITBUT) with all 3 treatments at 4 weeks. At 4 weeks post-CGC, 6 out of 7 biomarkers demonstrated a >25% reduction (in 40% of subjects). The same reduction (>25%) was seen in 10% of the subjects for CMC and in none of the subjects for HPG. No significantly different change to either evaporation rate or tear osmolarity was found following any of the three treatments. Conclusions: In this study, the CGC treatment resulted in the greatest reduction in ocular biomarkers of inflammation, while all 3 treatments reduced symptoms and improved tear stability. These results indicate that subject-perceived symptomatic improvements are not necessarily associated with a reduction in objective measures of inflammation.