Bank secrecy in offshore centres and capital flows: Does blacklisting matter?1. Issue 1 (17th October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Balakina, Olga; D'Andrea, Angelo; Masciandaro, Donato
• Is Part Of: Review of financial economics. Volume 32:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 30
• Page End: 57
• Publication Date: 2016-10-17
• Subjects: F21 -- K42; Bank secrecy -- Offshore centres -- International capital flows -- Name and shame regulation -- Money laundering; Business -- Periodicals; Economics -- Periodicals; Business; Economics; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 332.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2016.09.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1058-3300

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyses cross‐border capital flows in order to verify the existence and direction of the effect of the soft regulation promoted by international organizations against banking secrecy which characterized the so called tax and financial heavens. This effect is called in the literature Stigma Effect, but both the existence and the direction of the stigma effect are far from being obvious. The international capital flows can simply neglect the relevance of the blacklisting, or worst, the attractiveness of banking secrecy can produce a race to the bottom: the desire to elude more transparent regulation can sensibly influence the capital movements. We test whether being included and later excluded from the FATF blacklist is an effective measure that influences countries' cross‐border capital flows. Using annual panel data for the period 1996–2014, we apply our framework to 126 countries worldwide. We find evidence that in general the stigma effect does not exist.