Mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Issue 3 (7th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hirono, Seiko; Kawai, Manabu; Okada, Ken‐ichi; Miyazawa, Motoki; Shimizu, Atsushi; Kitahata, Yuji; Ueno, Masaki; Shimokawa, Toshio; Nakao, Akimasa; Yamaue, Hiroki
• Is Part Of: Annals of gastroenterological surgery. Volume 1:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 208
• Page End: 218
• Publication Date: 2017-06-07
• Subjects: borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR‐PDAC) -- mesenteric approach -- pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) -- resectable PDAC (R‐PDAC); Digestive organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.43
• DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2475-0328

Abstract

Abstract: Mesenteric approach is an artery‐first approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In the present study, we evaluated clinical and oncological benefits of this procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreas head. Between 2000 and 2015, 237 consecutive PDAC patients underwent PD. Among them, 72 experienced the mesenteric approach (mesenteric group) and 165 the conventional approach (conventional group). A matched‐pairs group consisted of 116 patients (58 patients in each group) matched for age, gender, resectability status, and neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in unmatched‐ and matched‐pair analyses. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the mesenteric group than in the conventional group in both resectable PDAC (R‐PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR‐PDAC) on unmatched‐ and matched‐pairs analyses (R‐PDAC, unmatched: 312.5 vs 510 mL, P =.008; matched: 312.5 vs 501.5 mL, P =.023; BR‐PDAC, unmatched: 507.5 vs 935 mL, P <.001; matched: 507.5 vs 920 mL, P =.003). Negative surgical margins (R0) and overall survival (OS) rates in the mesenteric group were better in R‐PDAC patients (R0 rates, unmatched: 100% vs 87.7%, P =.044; matched: 100% vs 86.7%, P =.045; OS, unmatched: P =.008, matched: P =.021), although there were no significant differences in BR‐PDAC patients. Mesenteric approach might reduce blood loss by early ligation of the vessels to the pancreatic head. Furthermore, it might increase R0 rate, leading to improvement of survival for R‐PDAC patients. However, R0 and survival rates could not be improved only by the mesenteric approach for BR‐PDAC patients. Therefore, effective multidisciplinary treatment is essential to improve survival in BR‐PDAC patients. Abstract : Mesenteric approach might reduce blood loss volume during PD in both R‐ and BR‐PDAC patients. Complete clearance around the SMA by mesenteric approach might increase the R0 rate for R‐PDAC patients, leading to improvement of the survival rate. However, this procedure alone may not be enough to increase R0 rate, decrease recurrence rate, and improve survival in BR‐PDAC patients.