Attributions of responsibility and punishment for ingroup and outgroup members: The role of just world beliefs. (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Halabi, Samer; Statman, Yael; Dovidio, John F.
• Is Part Of: Group processes and intergroup relations. Volume 18:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 104
• Page End: 115
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: group membership -- guilt attribution -- intergroup relations -- just world belief -- social identity theory; Intergroup relations -- Periodicals; Social groups -- Periodicals; 302.305
• DOI: 10.1177/1368430214546067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-4302

Abstract

People have a need to believe that the world is a just place. When confronted with injustice, this just world belief (JWB) is threatened. The present research, conducted in the context of relations between Israeli Jews and Arabs, examined how group membership of actor and participants' beliefs in a just world affect attributions of responsibility and punishment as a function of culpability of the actor. In particular, after measuring their JWB, Jewish participants ( n = 214) read a description of a Jewish or Arab driver who was guilty or nonguilty in a car accident in which an innocent pedestrian was injured. As predicted, participants attributed less blame and recommended less severe punishment for an ingroup than an outgroup member for the same event and stronger beliefs in a just world predicted recommendations for less severe punishment for ingroup members. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed.