How Do Somatic Markers Feature in Decision Making?. (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bartol, Jordan; Linquist, Stefan
• Is Part Of: Emotion review. Volume 7:Number 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 81
• Page End: 89
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: algorithmic level -- computational level -- decision making -- levels of analysis -- levels of description -- somatic marker hypothesis; Emotions -- Periodicals; Emotions -- Research -- Periodicals; 152.4
• DOI: 10.1177/1754073914553000
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-0739

Abstract

Several recent criticisms of the somatic marker hypothesis (SMH) identify multiple ambiguities in the way it has been formulated by its chief proponents. Here we provide evidence that this hypothesis has also been interpreted in various different ways by the scientific community. Our diagnosis of this problem is that SMH lacks an adequate computational-level account of practical decision making. Such an account is necessary for drawing meaningful links between neurological- and psychological-level data. The article concludes by providing a simple, five-step model of practical decision making. Recasting SMH in terms of this model generates more precise and empirically tractable computational-level hypotheses about the various ways that somatic markers might influence practical decisions.