Strategic Ignorance and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Critiquing the Discursive Segregation of UFOs from Scientific Inquiry. Issue 1 (27th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dodd, Adam
• Is Part Of: Astropolitics. Volume 16:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 75
• Page End: 95
• Publication Date: 2018-04-27
• Subjects: Astronautics and civilization -- Periodicals; Astronautics and state -- Periodicals; Space warfare -- Periodicals; 333.9405
• DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2018.1433409
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-7622

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Since the late 1940s, a tenacious disconnect between popular interest and professional disinterest in unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has typified the controversy surrounding the subject. Numerous high-profile scientists have seen the topic of UFOs as an opportunity to denounce and rectify a popular, yet allegedly misguided, conviction—that some UFOs are physical anomalies indicating the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence—and thus to advance the explanatory authority of science. Rather than constituting rigorous, informed, and effective assessments, however, the ways in which many prominent scientists publicly address the UFO question often exemplify both the problematic "boundary-work" of scientific discourse in this area and, more specifically, the role that logical fallacies can play in the rhetorical construction of scientific authority in public domains. Through a critical discourse analysis, this article argues that ignorance of UFO phenomena is socially and discursively constructed in ways that are conducive to the public faces of individuals and institutions. More broadly, it suggests that the rudimentary standard of science communication attending to the extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) hypothesis for UFOs inhibits public understanding of science, dissuades academic inquiry within the physical and social sciences, and undermines progressive space policy initiatives.