Measuring Mountain River Discharge Using Seismographs Emplaced Within the Hyporheic Zone. Issue 2 (7th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anthony, R. E.; Aster, R. C.; Ryan, S.; Rathburn, S.; Baker, M. G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 123:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 210
• Page End: 228
• Publication Date: 2018-02-07
• Subjects: fluvial seismology -- fluvial discharge -- river monitoring -- sediment transport -- hyporheic zone -- seismic noise; Geomorphology -- Periodicals; 551.3
• DOI: 10.1002/2017JF004295
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9003

Abstract

Abstract: Flow and sediment transport dynamics in fluvial systems play critical roles in shaping river morphology, in the design and use of riverine infrastructure, and in the broader management of watersheds. However, these properties are often difficult to measure comprehensively. Previous work has suggested the use of proximal seismic signals resulting from flow and bed load transport to construct more complete records of these fluvial processes. We investigate a small (184 km 2 ; < 20 m 3 /s), snowmelt‐fed mountain river in the Northern Colorado Rocky Mountains during May–August 2015 to capture peak runoff with colocated measurements of discharge and seismic noise. Three‐component seismometers were placed in close proximity to the channel bank (~1 m) within the hyporheic zone (at times submerged beneath the water table). We recorded a broad spectrum of seismic signals excited by discharge, including novel, low‐frequency (0.1–2 Hz) signals observed predominantly on the horizontal components. The characteristics of these low‐frequency signals are not consistent with an elastically propagating seismic wave. We instead infer that they likely arise from the sensor tilting in response to viscoelastic deformation occurring near the channel and propose large‐scale turbulent eddies as a forcing mechanism. Calibrating horizontal seismic power with hydrograph flow rates over the course of a rainstorm for individual sensors, we demonstrate that these unique signals can be used to accurately estimate river discharge with simple regressions. This technique shows promise for augmenting seismic monitoring of rivers by enabling discharge rates to be estimated from outside the channel using easily deployed and noninvasive seismic instrumentation. Plain Language Summary: We deploy a small array of seismometers in close proximity to a small mountain river in Northern Colorado to record seismic signals in conjunction with peak snowmelt runoff during the summer of 2015. The seismic instruments are colocated with measurements of discharge (in channel pressure transducer), suspended sediment, and precipitation. After a short calibration period with discharge (here a rainstorm over which large variations in discharge occurred), we found that accurate discharge rates could be obtained solely through signals recorded on the horizontal components of the seismometers. The signals likely arise from the seismic sensor physically tilting as it is forced by pressure pulses on the stream bank generated by turbulent water flow. Determining discharge rates in this manner may usefully complement seismic arrays designed to continuously monitor sediment transport in fluvial systems. Key Points: Novel, low‐frequency (0.1–2 Hz) signals are recorded using near‐stream seismometers These signals appear on the horizontal components of seismometers and can be used to determine discharge rates after empirical calibration These low‐frequency signals are interpreted to arise through local strain and tilting excited by pressure variations on the channel bank